CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12] — Page 551

56.

Member

of

the

caty phone spectator, but from a marader Commission, to whom I put the question in a

・dircel shape.

were

anw

But I shounew

to

weary

This Excellerop if I

quote all the shatcomings of these minutio,

uw reserving my night to raise that question hereafter,

I gladly forbear.

To conclude

my defence, it only remains

for

mo

to

point

inexact

the

a

Report

1838

insufficient grounds!

It is a

fallacy to consider the

to consider the decision of

the Commissioners an an' ex 'baldiel.

eut

14 pation of allr

My first

proposition has been established

from ther

Report; -

anx a more citation of.

the language of some of its findings will demonstrate the goodies of my

a long

Weith

regard

Seem D.

I to charge Sep, thin say,

and intimato Connection between Alm

baldwell

out what I conceive to be an

representation, and

fallacy; on both of which

present charges against-

It is intract to say.

Me

are

based.

as indeed I have

that none

the (nineteen) 'Charges (against-Am Caldwell)

' have been substantially proved,

of them

au

beuditing Mr Ildwell's denial.

Letter, Fc. of the minutes of Evidence,

222 July

233

·$858" the 14′′ In

98.

already

shewn by

a

close

analysis-

of

and that many

reported to have been brought

༧ན

Inly

an&

Meak. Chow-wong has been

护

"proven; but that there is no peref of any~-~

een

' Connection by affinity according. A Chined

law

a custome

· leith

regards

to charge Seven, it is provca)

that Mr. Caldwell has been in the habit-

on

insufficient

Mah-chow

wings